Monthly Archives: October 2020

Visions of Pandemic Solutions

The path to hell often seems to be chosen and/or paved with good intentions.

There are competing visions of how to address problems such as pandemics. One vision is of a culture of consent and trust with a freed market, where medical institutions, businesses, and other organizations respond to pandemics and help people maintain their safety and means to continue living their lives. Another vision is of a culture of control and obedience, where political institutions declare large-scale solutions imposed by force.

My view is that the present covid problem is more complicated than many people make it out to be, and that looking at one simple metric, such as the short-term death counts from a single cause, is myopic and not solving the real problem, which is to secure people’s lives and freedom over the long-run. Authoritarian responses can and probably will lead to more deaths and loss of life-years than are caused by the virus itself. Even if authoritarian measures succeed in the short-run, there is an extreme price to be paid systemically for allowing such an authoritarian precedent to be established or authoritarian culture to grow. It’s yet another example of what Bastiat wrote about: the seen and the unseen.

In my view, the solutions to this problem are more properly found by medical institutions and individuals rather than political institutions. The best solutions will not be the same for every person or every geographical region.

Vaccination Defense

Whether with good or bad intentions, someone attempting to force an injection into someone else against their will should be very wary of the consequences.

If someone attempts, against your will, to inject you with anything, be it claimed to be vaccination or otherwise, you are justified in escalating to lethal force if necessary to defend yourself.

If you so defend yourself and you are taken to court and put on trial, with the argument that laws stipulate that you do not have the right to so defend yourself, then the jury is justified in using what’s called “jury nullification” to nullify these unjust laws and find you not guilty.

I am willing to so defend myself in such a situation, I’d be willing to form or join a militia to protect others from such a threat, and I’d nullify any such unjust laws.